Liga národů UEFA - Liga národů 2024/2025

0:7

1:1

Předvedla diskuze zde

https://www.eurofotbal.cz/liga-narodu-2024-2025/preview/gruzie-ukrajina-918363/?forum=1#post15852893

U nas sa to bratm za bratm mozno podari

https://spravy.stvr.sk/2025/03/v-rumunsku-zatkli-sest-ludi-za-vlastizradu-mali-vytvorit-polovojensku-organizaciu-a-hladat-podporu-u-rusov/?fbclid=IwY2xjawI37YtleHRuA2FlbQIxMQABHWUObGrhRP62zQzgnvPaCe6I9m2nEempPCGQvCanNT6aNcUITxOv4_N3XA_aem_vRTdFu5RWH3CEfhbM03K5A

A senior White House official says-“Trump’s rage has been intensifying” at Russia intensifying strikes on Ukraine whilst he is pushing for a ceasefire.

*surprised pikachu* i kdyz to je nejspis picovina. Cokoli co rekne nekdo z US administrativy, je treba brat jako kdyz to rika Peskov.

https://x.com/mskalick/status/1898102074472382783?s=46&t=nvS9tDol9WHw_h2fqvXiLw

Prepis rozhovoru s Kulebou, v podstate vse co zdejsi EF odbornici jiz vedi/tusi, ale i tak fajn

https://x.com/KareemRifai/status/1897792955781374142

Nevím co je horší. Jestli možnost, že je fakt tak hloupý ignorant, že neví, proč mají s Japonskem takovou dohodu. Nebo že je takový sráč, že dělá, že to neví.

Musk navrhuje vystoupeni USA z NATO

X zprav o tom, ze rusaci najednou vi moc dobre kde jsou v kursku jake pozice. Americani aktivne uz pomahaji russakum

Tak epizoda v kursku nejspis konci. Je jasne diky cemu to je, ale nema smysl to drzet dal v tehle situaci

Fun fact z hydeparku. Podle P. Hopkirka Rusko od roku 1552 do r. 1914 expanduje každý den o 110km čtverečních.

Prostě když můžou tak zabírají cizí území už stovky let…

Takže USA se solidně vybarvuje...

Po Ukrajině budou chtít nerosty, odstoupení Zelenskeho a i uznání ztráty území...

Putin jen v klidu sleduje...

Tak nečekaně Musk obviňuje Ukrajinu z kybernetického útoku na Twitter. Jasně, přesně to je pro ně to nejdůležitější.

Chce to Musk použít jak důvod, proč jim vypnout Starlink nebo má v hlavě něco jiného?

Americký prezident Donald Trump se v neděli nechal slyšet, že Rusko při jednáních o Ukrajině „nemá žádné karty“. Minulý týden přitom šéf Bílého domu prohlašoval, že Moskva na rozdíl od Kyjeva má „všechny karty“. Teď ovšem tvrdí, že je vlastně nemá nikdo.

Bude drama ještě.

https://www.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=10221341381604608&id=1850408410&rdid=9VfQi1xwQvOrmYr1#

hezky, ze Ukrajina prijmula primeri, ale Putin se jim vysmeje do ksichtu

USA obnovila vojenskou pomoc Ukrajině. To je veletoče myšlenek a kroků, v tom se nikdo nevyzná už.

Jinak ANO a SPD se nezúčastní bezpečnostní schůzky.

Pěkný čtení o tom, jak Trump vnímá obchodní jednání. Sedne jak prdel jak hranec

If anybody is wondering why Trump would engage in such absurd "negotiation" tactics, it can be traced to his history and pathology. Here's a professor whose specialty is negotiations discussing in-a-nutshell why Trump's tactics are incredibly foolish:

----

“I’m going to get a little wonky and write about Donald Trump and negotiations. For those who don't know, I'm an adjunct professor at Indiana University - Robert H. McKinney School of Law and I teach negotiations. Okay, here goes.

Trump, as most of us know, is the credited author of "The Art of the Deal," a book that was actually ghost written by a man named Tony Schwartz, who was given access to Trump and wrote based upon his observations. If you've read The Art of the Deal, or if you've followed Trump lately, you'll know, even if you didn't know the label, that he sees all dealmaking as what we call "distributive bargaining."

Distributive bargaining always has a winner and a loser. It happens when there is a fixed quantity of something and two sides are fighting over how it gets distributed. Think of it as a pie and you're fighting over who gets how many pieces. In Trump's world, the bargaining was for a building, or for construction work, or subcontractors. He perceives a successful bargain as one in which there is a winner and a loser, so if he pays less than the seller wants, he wins. The more he saves the more he wins.

The other type of bargaining is called integrative bargaining. In integrative bargaining the two sides don't have a complete conflict of interest, and it is possible to reach mutually beneficial agreements. Think of it, not a single pie to be divided by two hungry people, but as a baker and a caterer negotiating over how many pies will be baked at what prices, and the nature of their ongoing relationship after this one gig is over.

The problem with Trump is that he sees only distributive bargaining in an international world that requires integrative bargaining. He can raise tariffs, but so can other countries. He can't demand they not respond. There is no defined end to the negotiation and there is no simple winner and loser. There are always more pies to be baked. Further, negotiations aren't binary. China's choices aren't (a) buy soybeans from US farmers, or (b) don't buy soybeans. They can also (c) buy soybeans from Russia, or Argentina, or Brazil, or Canada, etc. That completely strips the distributive bargainer of his power to win or lose, to control the negotiation.

One of the risks of distributive bargaining is bad will. In a one-time distributive bargain, e.g. negotiating with the cabinet maker in your casino about whether you're going to pay his whole bill or demand a discount, you don't have to worry about your ongoing credibility or the next deal. If you do that to the cabinet maker, you can bet he won't agree to do the cabinets in your next casino, and you're going to have to find another cabinet maker.

There isn't another Canada.

So when you approach international negotiation, in a world as complex as ours, with integrated economies and multiple buyers and sellers, you simply must approach them through integrative bargaining. If you attempt distributive bargaining, success is impossible. And we see that already.

Trump has raised tariffs on China. China responded, in addition to raising tariffs on US goods, by dropping all its soybean orders from the US and buying them from Russia. The effect is not only to cause tremendous harm to US farmers, but also to increase Russian revenue, making Russia less susceptible to sanctions and boycotts, increasing its economic and political power in the world, and reducing ours. Trump saw steel and aluminum and thought it would be an easy win, BECAUSE HE SAW ONLY STEEL AND ALUMINUM - HE SEES EVERY NEGOTIATION AS DISTRIBUTIVE. China saw it as integrative, and integrated Russia and its soybean purchase orders into a far more complex negotiation ecosystem.

Trump has the same weakness politically. For every winner there must be a loser. And that's just not how politics works, not over the long run.

For people who study negotiations, this is incredibly basic stuff, negotiations 101, definitions you learn before you even start talking about styles and tactics. And here's another huge problem for us.

Trump is utterly convinced that his experience in a closely held real estate company has prepared him to run a nation, and therefore he rejects the advice of people who spent entire careers studying the nuances of international negotiations and diplomacy. But the leaders on the other side of the table have not eschewed expertise, they have embraced it. And that means they look at Trump and, given his very limited tool chest and his blindly distributive understanding of negotiation, they know exactly what he is going to do and exactly how to respond to it.

From a professional negotiation point of view, Trump isn't even bringing checkers to a chess match. He's bringing a quarter that he insists of flipping for heads or tails, while everybody else is studying the chess board to decide whether its better to open with Najdorf or Grünfeld.”

— David Honig, Robert H. McKinney School of Law and I teach negotiations

Russia will agree to a ceasefire in exchange for partial lifting of sanctions on the energy sector, — People's Deputy Buzhansky

Tohle je bohuzel ze strany USA dost hratelne. Sankce chteli uz i tak davat pryc